Lead enrichment pipeline
A real-estate firm uploads a CSV of property leads; we enrich each record against a public-records API, dedupe against existing contacts, and push the cleaned data into their CRM as a single batch import.
Connect the systems you already use so your data stops living in five places — and the manual handoffs go away.
Wiring two systems together used to start with an hour in someone else's documentation, just to learn whether what you wanted was possible. That part got much faster — I get a runnable first attempt and find out immediately. The expensive parts did not move: what the vendor means by an undocumented status code, and the retry logic and alerting that keep a broken sync from failing quietly for six weeks. Their release schedule still isn't mine.
A real-estate firm uploads a CSV of property leads; we enrich each record against a public-records API, dedupe against existing contacts, and push the cleaned data into their CRM as a single batch import.
Pulls auction listings nightly from multiple platforms, normalizes the schema, and lands the result in the client's database where their internal tools can query it.
Generated invoices in the client's portal automatically appear in their accounting software with the right account codes, line items, and payment-tracking links.
Price the problem before the fix. Count the entries someone re-keys between the two systems in a week, multiply by the minutes each takes and by what that person costs you, and annualize it — that number is what the integration is worth. I bill new work at $95 to $125 an hour. Most two-system syncs are a scoped piece of work rather than an open-ended project, and if a native connector or an off-the-shelf tool already covers your case, I will tell you that instead.
Yes. Migration off brittle Zapier and Make chains into something your team controls is routine work here. Those tools are genuinely good for getting started; they become a liability when a chain breaks silently, when per-task pricing outgrows the value, or when nobody left at the company knows what a given zap does.
It retries, and then it tells someone. Error handling, retry logic and alerting are part of the build rather than an add-on, because the failure mode that actually hurts is not an integration that breaks loudly — it is one that stops running and lets both systems drift apart for three weeks before anyone notices.
Yes. Custom integrations against any REST or SOAP API, plus webhook receivers that turn third-party events into actions in your stack. The absence of a listed connector is usually just the absence of a vendor partnership, not a technical obstacle.
Two-way is possible and is often what you actually want, but it is a larger commitment than one-way because the two systems will eventually disagree and something has to decide which one wins. That rule is a business decision rather than a technical one, and it is worth settling before the build rather than discovering it in production.
Tell me what you're trying to fix — I'll reply the same day.
Tell me a bit about what you're trying to build. I'll reply the same day, and we can hop on a call if it makes sense.
Or reach me directly — support@techefficientllc.com or (480) 359-2485.